Skip to content
Amman —

A comparison of the positions of Israeli parties!

The security issue dominates the general atmosphere in Israel. Thirty-seven political parties are entering the elections, and each party must clear the threshold of 3.25% of the votes. Competition is limited to two poles: Benjamin Netanyahu and Gadi Eisenkot. Their electoral promises differ, as the opposition focuses on forming an inquiry commission into the October 7 attack and determining who is responsible, as well as the current government's failures to achieve its stated objectives and the failure to manage the war. The opposition, led by Eisenkot, pledges a plan to continue the war for several months, strengthen the alliance with the United States, continue the war against Iran in partnership with Washington, eliminate the resistance forces—Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah—seek to implement Trump's plan regarding Gaza and reconstruction, capitalize on military achievements on the Syrian and Lebanese fronts, turn security understandings and agreements into peace agreements, expand the Abraham Accords with Arab countries, and improve Israel's image internationally. The opposition also announces its rejection of waging wars based on partisan beliefs, restoring the supremacy of the judiciary, and halting the funds approved for the ultra-Orthodox Haredi parties.

As for Netanyahu's position, he tries to evade responsibility for the events of October 7, focusing on the military achievements he has made in eliminating the leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iranian leaders, alongside the necessity of toppling the Iranian regime through excessive force, calling for imposing peace by force, and continuing wars for at least two years. Both sides agree on rejecting the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, while extremist right-wing factions call for toppling the Palestinian National Authority, ending its existence, and initiating annexation operations while attempting to displace as many residents of Gaza and the West Bank as possible by various means.

In light of these positions, we find that both sides represent two sides of the same coin, with no difference except in phrasing—meaning "vinegar is the brother of mustard." We believe that Netanyahu's departure will contribute to easing the atmosphere of war in the region and help achieve regional calm in the long run. Change will lead to a shift in style and the manner of dealing with regional issues, and it will reduce the specter of extremism and aggressiveness in the Israeli street, which has shifted 74% to the right. The Arab region will not calm down unless the political behavior of Israel's leaders changes, as well as that of Trump personally. Whoever fails to realize this will leave the region in a state of tension, friction, and instability.

Know more about this story?Send us a tip

Al Rai

AI

Ask about this report — answers stay grounded in its text.

Answers are experimental and grounded in Al Rai reporting. Each question uses 2 credits.