Skip to content
Amman —

What if we explained Netanyahu's mind and personality... What would we find???

It is not easy to understand the personality of Benjamin Netanyahu through his political and media image alone, as the man who spent nearly 19 years at the pinnacle of Israeli power, and succeeded in returning to the premiership more than once, appears in his speeches to be extremely confident, firm, cohesive, and capable of facing his opponents and surroundings, but getting closer to his personality, according to those who have worked with or under him, reveals a strange paradox in his personality, extreme obstinacy in public with psychological fragility from within, and arrogance that hides a deep fear of losing power.

Netanyahu has become a professional in living on the edge and in his ability to survive, and he has an exceptional ability to read and understand the public, using language and rhetoric that suit his target audience, and presenting himself as the indispensable man in facing security threats and challenges, and studies in analyzing his personality indicate traits associated with the need for power, high self-confidence, distrust of others, and resistance to imposed restrictions, but "Bibi's" problem is the transformation of confidence into certainty, and certainty into stubbornness and arrogance, as Netanyahu appears in many of his positions as if he does not only want to win the political battle he faces, but wants to prove that he was right all along, and this is a key point to understanding his behavior, as the man does not like to appear as retreating, and does not easily deal with the idea of admitting a mistake, and therefore, retreat for him becomes more than just a change in position, it becomes a threat to the image he has created for himself and about himself as a leader capable of protecting and leading Israel, and here another paradox appears: the more arrogant he appears, the more he may need to prove his strength.

Some psychological analyses published about his personality describe him as having a dominant and overbearing presence and rhetoric, with a tendency towards emotional detachment and caution in his relationships, while other political analyses indicate that the instinct for political survival and his high self-esteem played an important role in the transformations of his political behavior, and this does not mean that Netanyahu is weak in the traditional sense of weakness, but on the contrary, his ability to endure, political maneuvering, and adaptation to crises is one of his most prominent traits, but political strength is not always an indication of internal strength, sometimes the fear of loss turns into a clinging to power, and clinging turns into rigidity, and rigidity turns into aggression towards anyone who threatens the image or position, and his image comes to mind many times when he is in Knesset sessions and the speaker is an opposition figure hurling accusations and harsh criticism at him, I saw him extremely weak and with a gloomy face, which indicates that he sees himself only in moments of strength, and therefore, the key to Netanyahu's personality may be in this duality: a man who is extremely strong in the face of others, but extremely sensitive to the possibility of losing control, criticism, or even defamation, a man who raises his voice when he wants to appear decisive, and doubles his stubbornness when retreat becomes costly; and a man who built a large part of his political image on the idea that he alone is capable of protecting Israel, its security, and the security of Israelis. The paradox is that this same image has become the prison from which Netanyahu finds it difficult to escape, as the more Netanyahu needs to prove that he is the strongest, the more unable he is to admit a mistake, and the more he fears for his political legacy, the more he clings to his risky choices, and here the issue is no longer just a stubborn or arrogant personality, but the personality itself turns into a condition that is difficult to coexist or deal with except by those who have almost complete psychological control over him, such as his domineering wife, Sarah.

Netanyahu, in the end, may be a rare example of a man whose strength appears in his stubbornness, while his stubbornness, at the same time, reveals the extent of his fear of appearing weak.

And Netanyahu, in short... is he a complex mix of the stubbornness of strength and the strength of fear?

Rajatalab5@gmail.com

Know more about this story?Send us a tip

Al Rai

AI

Ask about this report — answers stay grounded in its text.

Answers are experimental and grounded in Al Rai reporting. Each question uses 2 credits.