The first is an ideology that believes in the right to life, as ancient as the waters in which Jesus Christ was baptized on this land some two thousand years ago, as rooted as the olive trees from whose wood crosses have been made across generations, and as inclusive as the history of a land that embraced those born on it and those who sought refuge in it for safety. It is an ideology that accompanied the emergence of the Jordanian state more than a century ago, bringing together its sons and daughters of different religions and origins under a single identity whose title is loyalty to the homeland.
As for the other ideology, it is an intrusive novelty with no prior roots... a culture that does not recognize the meaning or borders of the homeland and does not understand the responsibilities of citizenship. It replaces belonging with exclusion, loyalty with betrayal, and views the citizen as a partner in the homeland with suspicion and hatred. Its danger lies not only in the violence committed in its name, but in its attempt to convince its followers that many of their fellow citizens have less right to remain on the land they inherited and their ancestors built. This is the idea that must be confronted, not through security measures alone, but also through the way we raise our future generations and shape our understanding of ourselves and our national identity.


