However, the most important question raised among community circles and observers is: After political parties have moved beyond the box of numerical expansion, what are the next steps to become more effective in public life? This is to embody an influential partisan life with parties possessing programs that attract people, look after their interests, and are present in the national scene in all its manifestations.
Above all, high political leadership will has been strongly provided, guaranteeing the opening of the door for partisan work within the framework of the constitution and the law, with the goal of active participation in the Jordanian democratic experience, and indeed as an essential pillar within it.
Yet despite the availability of all these encouraging factors, accompanied by continuous modernization and development programs—especially regarding the parties and election laws to support parties in creating the desired active partisan life—public opinion circles still have questions about the ability of political parties to assume their responsibilities, to what extent this capability has reached, and whether the parties themselves have such an objective assessment of their journey.
What encourages talking about the Jordanian partisan experience is the importance and vitality of this experience, especially since the partisan march has achieved many positives and taken important steps within the context of the Jordanian democratic experience. At the same time, it is natural to discuss this important experience in a constructive critical spirit, highlighting its pros and cons. Reaching a point where parties participate in the executive and legislative authorities is a matter that has been achieved and is expanding over time as a natural output of the laws governing political life. However, creating a partisan life and having a presence in society through programs and persuasion is the task of the parties themselves, requiring further partisan effort to be completed, and it is not an impossible task.
